Comments on: Romania says yes to OOXML once again http://aranea.zuavra.net/index.php/97/ The Web, the way we make it Sat, 17 May 2008 17:07:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: MrSmersh http://aranea.zuavra.net/index.php/97/#comment-106890 MrSmersh Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:37:40 +0000 http://aranea.zuavra.net/index.php/97/#comment-106890 I Computer Solution joined in October or so... MS regional director is a country title. And we can continue over and over with inaccuracies interpretations and so. And as we have talked over and over on Tic-Lobby and everywhere please "get the facts first then talk". Why do not talk about of avoid the discussion on the text of the standard and instead hiding under the Rob (or name you favorite corporate employee ) mantle, and other discussions on the kind: “it is bad!” “why so?” “because somebody …. said that!” “you have tried to do that?, it exist in the current version of the standard, you have looked ?” “….” Also bare in mind that the vote composition YES/NO/Abstained remained virtually unchanged between voting, and even Microsoft cannot perform this kind of miracle. So I suppose you could say that is pretty consistent with the position of the Romanian market. Look at the end of the day if the corporations did not mess in this process we will still be a few trampled with documents in ASRO trying to get some work done. You add 2-3 corporations and you have this mess of corporate war waged in the ISO. I Computer Solution joined in October or so… MS regional director is a country title. And we can continue over and over with inaccuracies interpretations and so.
And as we have talked over and over on Tic-Lobby and everywhere please "get the facts first then talk".
Why do not talk about of avoid the discussion on the text of the standard and instead hiding under the Rob (or name you favorite corporate employee ) mantle, and other discussions on the kind:
“it is bad!”
“why so?”
“because somebody …. said that!”
“you have tried to do that?, it exist in the current version of the standard, you have looked ?”
“….”
Also bare in mind that the vote composition YES/NO/Abstained remained virtually unchanged between voting, and even Microsoft cannot perform this kind of miracle. So I suppose you could say that is pretty consistent with the position of the Romanian market.
Look at the end of the day if the corporations did not mess in this process we will still be a few trampled with documents in ASRO trying to get some work done. You add 2-3 corporations and you have this mess of corporate war waged in the ISO.

]]> By: The Linux Index » Jani Monoses: Romania maintains OOXML approval http://aranea.zuavra.net/index.php/97/#comment-105854 The Linux Index » Jani Monoses: Romania maintains OOXML approval Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:42:21 +0000 http://aranea.zuavra.net/index.php/97/#comment-105854 [...] many more details in English check this blog, while Romanian readers can check out this [...] […] many more details in English check this blog, while Romanian readers can check out this […]

]]> By: The size matters; especially in Romania :( | Lucian Savluc - Blog http://aranea.zuavra.net/index.php/97/#comment-105691 The size matters; especially in Romania :( | Lucian Savluc - Blog Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:59:39 +0000 http://aranea.zuavra.net/index.php/97/#comment-105691 [...] I found this article pretty interesting and pretty self explanatory. Although the author is playing with suppositions, I would suggest you read, think and decide for yourself. What is your common sense saying? “Romania says yes to OOXML once again” [...] […] I found this article pretty interesting and pretty self explanatory. Although the author is playing with suppositions, I would suggest you read, think and decide for yourself. What is your common sense saying? “Romania says yes to OOXML once again” […]

]]> By: Skippy http://aranea.zuavra.net/index.php/97/#comment-105666 Skippy Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:28:19 +0000 http://aranea.zuavra.net/index.php/97/#comment-105666 Yes, you are perfectly right of course. The 25th was the day of the vote. I have corrected the text in the meanwhile, thanks for pointing it out. Yes, you are perfectly right of course. The 25th was the day of the vote. I have corrected the text in the meanwhile, thanks for pointing it out.

]]> By: Bogdan Bivolaru http://aranea.zuavra.net/index.php/97/#comment-105640 Bogdan Bivolaru Thu, 27 Mar 2008 05:25:20 +0000 http://aranea.zuavra.net/index.php/97/#comment-105640 "Several participants have reported that the actual meeting, which took place on March 23, was well organized and civil, and that heated outbursts were few and restricted to the debate portion of the discussions." Pardon me, the official CT210 meeting wasn't it on March 25? If not, which is then the Official ASRO meeting? "Several participants have reported that the actual meeting, which took place on March 23, was well organized and civil, and that heated outbursts were few and restricted to the debate portion of the discussions."

Pardon me, the official CT210 meeting wasn't it on March 25? If not, which is then the Official ASRO meeting?

]]>